Nadia Mohammed

Introduction

Nadia Mohammed is a former UK registered nurse and midwife who was struck off the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) register following a Fitness to Practise Committee hearing that concluded on 21 July 2026. Registered under PIN 12I1915E, she was involved with intravenous (IV) drip solutions, and the case against her centred on products distributed or sold to White Night London Ltd, the company identified in the charges as Company A. The NMC panel found that she allowed vials to be labelled with a false lot number, a false expiry date and an inaccurate ingredients list, and that she acted dishonestly so the product would appear more valuable than it was. Concluding that public protection and the public interest required it, the panel imposed the most serious sanction available to it: erasure from the register.

Background Information

Ms Mohammed was registered with the NMC as a nurse under PIN 12I1915E and was also a registered midwife. The conduct alleged against her spanned 2019 to 2022 and concerned IV drip solutions. According to the charges, she distributed or sold products to Company A (White Night London Ltd) without the permission of the manufacturer, and vials carried labels displaying the ‘Intravita’ name without that company’s knowledge or permission. The determination also references Ms Charpilloz, identified in the panel’s aggravating findings as one of the parties in whom trust had been placed.

The substantive hearing ran from 13 July 2026 to 21 July 2026, with the decision issued on 21 July 2026. The outcome was erasure — what is commonly called being struck off. As the determination explains, erasure “removes the practitioner from the register” and the person is “no longer permitted to practise this profession in the UK”, and it “can be reviewed after a minimum of five years, but is otherwise indefinite”.

The Controversy or Incident That Led to Their Cancellation

Adjudicated (regulatory). These are civil-standard findings made by an NMC Fitness to Practise panel — not a criminal conviction; the published determination records no criminal proceedings against Ms Mohammed.

The NMC alleged that, between 2019 and 2022 and in her capacity as a Registered Nurse, Ms Mohammed: (1) distributed or sold IV drip products to Company A (White Night London Ltd) without the permission of the manufacturer; (2) created and/or allowed labels to be placed on vials displaying a false lot number, a false expiry date, a list of ingredients that did not reflect the true ingredients within them, and the ‘Intravita’ name without Intravita’s knowledge or permission; (3) did so with the intention of making the product appear to be of a higher value than it was; and (4) acted dishonestly, in that she knew she was distributing products with false information displayed on them. The charges concluded that her fitness to practise was impaired by reason of misconduct.

The panel proved charges 1, 2(a) and 2(b) by way of admission, and found charges 2(c), 2(d), 3 and 4 proved. It concluded that the facts amounted to misconduct, identifying breaches of the NMC Code at standards 10.3, 14.1, 14.2, 18, 20.1, 20.2 and 21.3. The panel found that she “acted dishonestly to make the product appear more valuable”, that “insight and remorse were limited, particularly in relation to the dishonesty and the duty of candour”, and that attitudinal concerns “had not been remedied and would be difficult to remediate”. All four limbs of the Grant test were engaged, and the panel identified “a real risk of repetition”, finding her fitness to practise currently impaired on both public protection and public interest grounds.

On sanction, the panel determined that a striking-off order was “the only sanction that was sufficient, appropriate and proportionate”, and it imposed an interim suspension order of 18 months to cover the appeal period.

The panel identified limited mitigation: early admissions on charges 1, 2(a) and 2(b), and some remorse shown. Its aggravating findings were more extensive. Ms Mohammed, the panel found, “abused the trust between her and Intravita, White Night, Ms Charpilloz and the clients receiving care”; there was a “pattern of misconduct over a period of time, approximately 18 months”; and her conduct risked “placing people receiving care from herself and/or White Night at risk of harm”. The panel further cited a lack of transparency, in that she had “not been fully open and honest during the process of this hearing”, alongside limited insight into her failings and a “degree of premeditation”.

Public Reaction and Consequences

The published determination documents the regulatory outcome rather than media coverage, and the source records no public commentary on the case. The documented consequences were nonetheless substantial. Erasure means Ms Mohammed is no longer permitted to practise as a nurse or midwife in the UK, and the 18-month interim suspension order ensured her removal took effect immediately, covering the appeal period rather than waiting for any appeal to conclude. Because the determination is published by the NMC and republished by services such as MedicWatch, the findings against her now form part of the public record of UK healthcare regulation.

Current Status

As of the determination dated 21 July 2026, Ms Mohammed stands struck off the NMC register, with an 18-month interim suspension order in force to cover the appeal period. The source records no appeal against the decision. Erasure can be reviewed after a minimum of five years but is otherwise indefinite; until any such review, she may not practise as a nurse or midwife in the United Kingdom.

Impact on Their Career/Life

The striking-off order ends Ms Mohammed’s ability to work as a registered nurse or midwife in the UK, and the dishonesty finding sits at the centre of both the sanction and its likely durability. The panel’s conclusions that her insight and remorse were limited, that her attitudinal concerns “would be difficult to remediate”, and that there was a real risk of repetition, all point to the obstacles she would face in any future attempt to return to the register. The panel did acknowledge the mitigation of her early admissions and some remorse, but judged that only erasure was sufficient, appropriate and proportionate. Any review of the erasure order cannot occur until at least five years have passed, meaning the practical effect on her career is, for the foreseeable future, a permanent bar from UK nursing and midwifery practice.