Rula Jebreal

Rula Jebreal #

Introduction #

Rula Jebreal is a Palestinian foreign policy analyst, journalist, novelist, and screenwriter who became the subject of widespread condemnation in September 2026 after she referred to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) as a “bought and paid by AIPAC monkey” and an “errand boy” during a podcast appearance. The remarks, made while she criticized Jeffries’ support for Israel, drew a rebuke from the Congressional Black Caucus and multiple Democratic lawmakers, who described the language as racist. Jebreal subsequently issued an unconditional apology on X.

Background Information #

Jebreal was born in Haifa on April 24, 1973, and grew up in Jerusalem, spending much of her childhood at the Dar El-Tifel orphanage, whose founder she has credited with saving her life. In 1993 she received a scholarship from the Italian government to study at the University of Bologna, and she went on to work as a journalist in Italy for roughly twelve years, including as an interviewer on the political television program AnnoZero.

Her first novel, Miral, was published in 2003 and was later adapted into a feature film. She holds dual Israeli and Italian citizenship and describes herself as a Palestinian foreign policy analyst. Breitbart described her as a former MSNBC commentator who left the cable network in 2014, while The Jerusalem Post identified her as a Palestinian journalist and author.

The Controversy or Incident That Led to Their Cancellation #

The controversy began during an appearance on “The Left Hook,” a podcast hosted by progressive commentator Wajahat Ali, in which Jebreal criticized Jeffries’ support for Israel and accused him of doing the bidding of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). “His name is Hakeem. ‘Hakeem’ is an Arabic name which means ‘healer.’ He’s not a healer, he’s a divider,” she said, before adding: “He is a bought and paid by AIPAC monkey. With all due respect — and I don’t mean it in a racist way. He is just basically an errand boy, and we’re done and tired.”

Ali interjected in real time to note that using the term “monkey” about a Black man carries “terrible racial connotations.” Jebreal attempted to clarify that she had been referring to the image of the three wise monkeys — one who cannot see, one who cannot hear, and one who cannot speak. Critics rejected that explanation.

Clips of the exchange spread widely on social media beginning around September 4, 2026, prompting a rapid backlash from Black lawmakers and becoming the subject of coverage in outlets including the New York Post, Mediaite, and The Jerusalem Post.

Public Reaction and Consequences #

The Congressional Black Caucus issued a statement on X on September 4, writing: “To be clear, there isn’t a non-racist way to call Leader Jeffries — a Black man — a ‘monkey’ or ’errand boy.’” The caucus also criticized Ali for platforming the remarks, saying that low standards for political discourse lead people to become “comfortable being openly bigoted,” and adding, “We have to stop platforming and trafficking in anti-Black racism, whether it’s on the political right or the left.”

Democratic lawmakers condemned the remarks as well. Rep. Shontel Brown (D-OH) wrote that it was “reprehensibly racist language that must be condemned,” noting there was “no subtext, no dog whistle, just easily going straight to ‘monkey.’” Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) said calling Jeffries “or any Black man a monkey or errand boy is absolutely disgusting and unacceptable under any circumstances.” Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) argued that “calling a Black man a ‘monkey’ is racist. Full stop,” and faulted what he called the deafening silence of some on the left. Other Democrats, including Reps. Luz Rivas, Joe Neguse, Nikema Williams, and Pete Aguilar, issued similar condemnations.

Jebreal responded with a statement on X: “I am disgusted and horrified that Hakeem Jeffries is taking money from AIPAC amidst Israel’s genocide in Palestine. That said, a term that I used to describe him was inappropriate and offensive and should never have been used. I apologize unconditionally.” Ali acknowledged that he had challenged the remark during the recording and wrote, “Rula has unconditionally apologized for her words, regardless of the context or her intent.”

Current Status #

As of this writing, the documented consequences of the incident consist of the Congressional Black Caucus statement, condemnations from Democratic lawmakers, and Jebreal’s public apology; no professional action against her, such as a loss of employment or a canceled platform, had been reported in the source coverage. Jeffries’ office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the New York Post.

The apology itself drew mixed notices: while Ali characterized it as unconditional, the New York Post described it as “backhanded” because Jebreal paired it with renewed criticism of Jeffries’ AIPAC funding.

Impact on Their Career/Life #

The immediate impact on Jebreal was reputational rather than professional, at least as documented in the available reporting. A longtime analyst and author with a public profile built over two decades in Italian, American, and international media, she saw the episode dominate coverage of her in early September 2026 and became the subject of condemnation from some of the most prominent Black lawmakers in Congress.

The episode also fed a broader debate about standards of political rhetoric. Lawmakers across the Democratic caucus insisted that racist language must be condemned regardless of the speaker’s ideology, with Torres and others arguing that comparable conduct on the right is routinely denounced while similar language from anti-Israel-lobby figures is treated more leniently. Whether the episode produces lasting consequences for Jebreal’s career remains to be seen.

Page updated: September 4, 2026