Juliette Johnson
Introduction
Juliette Johnson was a registered nurse with the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), registration number 00Y0167E, who had provided community and end-of-life care when a fitness-to-practise panel found she had breached professional boundaries and acted with a lack of integrity by accepting monetary gifts totalling £39,300, in twelve cheques, from an elderly patient and his wife over about two and a half years. In a decision dated 5 June 2026, the NMC’s Fitness to Practise Committee found her fitness to practise impaired by reason of misconduct and made a striking-off order .
Background Information
Johnson was registered with the NMC as a nurse under PIN 00Y0167E . The determination records that she had provided community and end-of-life care, and that she was working privately with the couple concerned when the cheques were given . Beyond her name, registration number and the outcome of her case, the public pages published by MedicWatch contain little biographical detail: they record no date of birth, no training history and no earlier regulatory findings .
The Controversy or Incident That Led to Their Cancellation
Adjudicated vs. alleged. The findings in this section come from a Nursing and Midwifery Council fitness-to-practise panel determination, which decided the charges on the balance of probabilities. Charges found proved are regulatory findings, not criminal convictions; Juliette Johnson was found NOT proved on Charge 2, the allegation that she failed to declare any or all of the gifts. Nothing here is a criminal record unless the determination itself states one.
The charges alleged that Miss Johnson, a registered nurse who had provided community and end-of-life care, had: (1) breached professional boundaries by accepting monetary gifts set out in a schedule of twelve cheques, totalling £39,300, from Patient A and his wife, Person B; (2) failed to declare any or all of those gifts; and (3) acted with a lack of integrity in relation to charges 1 and 2 .
The panel found charges 1 and 3 proved and charge 2 not proved, accepting that, as she was working privately with the couple when the undeclared cheques were given, she was not obliged to declare them to her agency. It found that the monies Miss Johnson accepted were gifts and that, by accepting substantial gifts from vulnerable patients over about two and a half years, she breached professional boundaries and acted with a lack of integrity, contrary to the NMC Code, amounting to serious misconduct. Applying the Grant test, it concluded she had placed Patient A and Person B at unwarranted risk of financial harm, brought the profession into disrepute, and breached fundamental tenets of the profession. Although it noted insight in her reflective piece, remorse, testimonials and relevant training, and considered the risk of repetition low, it was not satisfied she would not repeat her actions with other vulnerable patients given the attitudinal nature of the integrity failing. It found her fitness to practise currently impaired on both public protection and public interest grounds . The panel’s mitigating factors were early admission of some of the facts, developing insight, relevant training courses and a reflective piece; its aggravating factors were abuse of a position of trust, deliberate and multiple breaches of the Code, a pattern of misconduct over a considerable period of time, and the vulnerability of Patient A and Person B .
Public Reaction and Consequences
The immediate consequence was regulatory: a striking-off order made at a substantive hearing that ran from 1 June to 5 June 2026 . Neither the determination page nor the practitioner profile records any press coverage, public statements or online campaigns connected with the case; both confine themselves to the regulator’s findings and links to the underlying decision . MedicWatch, which describes itself as an independent record service aggregating publicly published decisions of UK healthcare regulators, added the case to its record on 7 July 2026 .
Current Status
Johnson’s most recent recorded outcome is erasure — struck off the register — decided on 5 June 2026 by the NMC . Her profile page notes that she was erased from the register at the last register check, verified against the NMC register on 8 July 2026, and directs readers to the official register for current registration details . MedicWatch’s explainer notes that the regulator directed removal from the register in this decision, that the decision sets out when the direction takes effect and any appeal provisions, and that readers should check the official NMC register for the practitioner’s current registration status .
Impact on Their Career/Life
The erasure removed Johnson from the register on which her status as a registered nurse depended. The panel accepted significant mitigation — early admissions, developing insight, remorse, training and testimonials — but concluded that the attitudinal nature of the integrity failing meant it could not be satisfied she would not repeat her actions with other vulnerable patients, and found impairment on both public protection and public interest grounds . The determination page gives no information about her subsequent employment or personal circumstances, and the profile records no later regulatory decisions . Her case remains part of MedicWatch’s browsable record of nurse erasures, listed under the outcome “struck off the register” with the decision date of 5 June 2026 .